Which statement best describes the relationship between observations and conclusions? a) observations are based on conclusions b) conclusions are based on observations c) observations and conclusions both depend on research d) neither conclusions nor observations depend on research.

i would say B bc conclusions include observations

1. They are (impossible for both to exist together at the same time). 
2. (more than two, but not a lot of) explanations (of why things work or happen the way they do)make up an (instance of watching, noticing, or making a statement). 
3. (more than two, but not a lot of) (instances of watching, noticing, or making statements) makeup an explanation (of why something works or happens the way it does). 
4. There is a back and forth/equal between people and energetic/changing interaction between them.

37.Observation and scientific theory are both related. Because it needs hypothesis and experiment to be able to have an actual data to show. For example: If you want to know how a monggo seeds grow on a wet cotton. Then you should be preparing the needed things and perform the experiment. You need to observe to be able to get the scientific theory of how this experiment works. That’s how observation and scientific theory is related. They will always be together in science.

Cause of sea level rise : 4. melting glacial ice, 5. thermal expansion of sea water,

Effect of sea level rise  : 3. increases in coastal erosion, 1. more frequent coastal flooding.

Not related to sea level rise : 6. depletion of the ozone layer, 2. hotter temperatures,

Explanation:

As each and every phenomenon on earth is related to the cause and effect of the natural events that take place on the globe the causes if the sea level rise is the melting of the glacier ice and expansion of the seawater by the heat waves. The effects of which can be observed on the increase of coals erosion and more frequent flooding along the coasts, while some other factors that maybe not related to this are depletion of the ozone layer and hot temperature in summers.

All can be used to make a new scientific law .

An observation is an actual fact. So once you observe something you need to explain what it actually is your observing. So it's giving a written response to the object or experiment you're observing. (Hope it helps)

Hypothesis is a guess and observation observes the guess

in Scientific method observation comes first,,,
hypothesis is a short time theory made on the basis of observation..
hypothesis depends upon observation...
you suggest any statement about the phenomenon that you felt either my your mind or senses that is hypothesis...

Observations are things you use your "five senses" to determine - how something smells, looks, tastes, sounds, or feels. Inference is something that you assume based on previous knowledge.

Observations are what you can observe by looking at your science experiment (such as colour, smell, etc.). These occur during the experiment. Hypotheses are your scientific predictions on what you think is going to happen before you actually begin the experiment and can be either supported or not supported (e.g., if you were wrong you would say "my hypotheses was not supported")